Is peso cost-averaging a good idea?

By Randell Tiongson on September 26th, 2021

Question: I am Fred, in my 30s and an employee. After many years, I was finally able to open two investment accounts, one for mutual funds and another one for stocks. After joining many Facebook groups, I learned about the strategy called peso cost averaging. Is peso cost averaging always the best strategy? —Fred via e-mail

Answer: It is good to know that you’re taking the initiative to read and learn about investing. It’s always better to do research and study first, instead of facing something head on, especially in investing.

Learning and researching beforehand tells me that you have the discipline to make smart decisions, instead of depending solely on your instinct and gut feeling. Making smart decisions is important when it comes to investing.

As for your question, peso cost averaging is a great strategy because it builds the habit of setting aside money for your investments regularly, unlike lump sum payments. However, it is not without drawbacks.

Pros and cons of peso cost averaging (or PCA)

Pros:  It is affordable. Gone are the days when you need hundreds of thousands of pesos to start investing. Today, you can open an investment account for P1,000 through fund providers of even as low as P50 via GCash’s GInvest (tip: put a set amount into your investment on a monthly basis).

PCA comes into play when you buy investments, be it more units of mutual funds, UITFs or stock shares, on a regular basis. For those who cannot afford a lump sum investment and have only a few thousands or even just a few hundreds to spare, PCA is a good first step into investing.

You ride market highs and lows. Markets tend to follow an up-and-down cycle. One day, company A’s stock may be priced at P2 per share, and it can dip to P1.50 the following day. PCA evens out your risk by buying shares in different prices.

Sometimes you can buy shares that are a bit more expensive than the last time you bought them, but you can also buy shares for a lower price at other times.

You lessen your emotional investment. When you put a lump sum investment and it tanks the following day, week or month, it would be harder on your psyche than if you put in P1,000 every month through PCA and lost.

When you do PCA, you become mechanical, rather than emotional. You’re putting in P1,000 every month because you’ve built the habit. If the market tanks, it’s the best time for you to buy, unlike in lump sum investing—when you buy high, you pray for the market to go up so you don’t lose your hard-earned money.

Cons: You can miss out on bigger returns. PCA allows you to ride the highs and lows of the market, so this evens out your risk. But you’ve heard the saying, ‘high risk, high reward,’ and when you buy shares during a market low with a lump sum investment, you may jump for joy when you get your returns.

A 20-percent return on a one-time P500,000 investment is P100,000. In PCA, you’ll be buying stock shares or index fund units at different prices, so your returns may not add up to P100,000 even if you’ve put in P500,000 over time. It’s best to note that no one can really time the market and there’s no saying when the market will bottom out, so it is best to do your research first before deciding on whether to do lump sum investing or PCA.

Now, that you know the pros and cons of peso cost averaging, you can decide whether or not to push through with PCA.

Why not do both?

Why not do both? Put in a lump sum to open your initial investment account and then add a percentage of your income regularly. Or you an also do what I do, I invest monthly and when the market dips and I have extra funds, I invest more.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 by Randell Tiongson | SEO by SEO-Hacker. Designed, managed and optimized by Sean Si

Be a pal and share this would ya?
Is peso cost-averaging a good idea?